Countries where authors publish in Polymer Composites
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polymer Composites. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polymer Composites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polymer Composites more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Polymer Composites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polymer Composites.
About Polymer Composites
The 10.5k papers published in Polymer Composites in the last decades have received a total of 176.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Polymer Composites usually cover Polymers and Plastics (6.2k papers), Mechanics of Materials (3.9k papers), Biomaterials (1.8k papers), Mechanical Engineering (3.6k papers) and Automotive Engineering (717 papers) specifically the topics of Mechanical Behavior of Composites (2.5k papers), Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites (2.4k papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (2.2k papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (1.4k papers), Epoxy Resin Curing Processes (1.2k papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (1.2k papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (1.1k papers) and Tribology and Wear Analysis (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polymer Composites are D. M. Bigg, Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa, Suchart Siengchin, Suresh G. Advani, Uttandaraman Sundararaj, Maya Jacob John, Hatsuo Ishida, O. Breuer, Rajesh D. Anandjiwala and R. Gauvin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.