Physica C Superconductivity

23.2k papers and 261.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 23.2k papers published in Physica C Superconductivity in the last decades have received a total of 261.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Physica C Superconductivity usually cover Condensed Matter Physics (21.2k papers), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (9.3k papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (6.9k papers) specifically the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (20.1k papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6.6k papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (4.7k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physica C Superconductivity are J. E. Hirsch, John R. Clem, Yuh Shiohara, K.‐H. Müller, M. Marezio, Shi Xue Dou, M. Murakami, Shōji Tanaka, H. Yamauchi and J. L. Tallon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physica C Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physica C Superconductivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physica C Superconductivity.

Countries where authors publish in Physica C Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physica C Superconductivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physica C Superconductivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physica C Superconductivity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025