Journal of pharmacopuncture

454 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 454 papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture usually cover Pharmacology (184 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (143 papers) and Molecular Biology (108 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare and Venom Research (158 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (46 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of pharmacopuncture are Hossein Hosseinzadeh, Anisur Rahman Khuda‐Bukhsh, Naina Mohamed Pakkir Maideen, Avinaba Mukherjee, Bina Gidwani, Prasad G. Jamkhande, Bibi Marjan Razavi, Alireza Tavakkoli, Vahid Reza Askari and Hossein Zolfagharian.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of pharmacopuncture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of pharmacopuncture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of pharmacopuncture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of pharmacopuncture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025