Pharmacognosy Research

968 papers and 12.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 968 papers published in Pharmacognosy Research in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacognosy Research usually cover Plant Science (392 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (237 papers) and Molecular Biology (225 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (163 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (160 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacognosy Research are Ian Edwin Cock, Shailendra Saraf, Snehal S. Patel, Chanchal Deep Kaur, Eric Wei Chiang Chan, Swarnamoni Das, Saeed Samarghandian, Abasalt Borji, Chatragadda Ramesh and Milena Nikolova.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmacognosy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacognosy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacognosy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacognosy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacognosy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacognosy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacognosy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025