The 1.5k papers published in Interpretation in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations.
Papers published in Interpretation usually cover Geophysics (1.0k papers), Mechanics of Materials (598 papers) and Ocean Engineering (592 papers) specifically the topics of Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (873 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (573 papers) and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (473 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interpretation are Kurt J. Marfurt, Sergey Fomel, Fangyu Li, Tao Zhao, Hongliu Zeng, Xinming Wu, Ghassan AlRegib, Bruce S. Hart, Ian Davison and Tonglou Guo.
In The Last Decade
Interpretation
1.4k papers
receiving
13.5k citations
Peers
Interpretation
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
Geophysics9.1k
Ocean Engineering5.5k
Mechanics of Materials5.3k
Mechanical Engineering4.3k
Geology1.7k
Replace First Break with:
First BreakUnited Kingdom
Journal of Geophysics and EngineeringChina
Petroleum GeoscienceUnited Kingdom
Solid EarthGermany
Journal of Earth ScienceChina
Environmental and Engineering GeoscienceUnited States
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interpretation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interpretation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.