Pacific Focus

439 papers and 1.3k indexed citations

About

The 439 papers published in Pacific Focus in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Focus usually cover Political Science and International Relations (248 papers), Sociology and Political Science (216 papers) and Development (63 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (129 papers), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (108 papers) and International Development and Aid (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Focus are Renato Cruz De Castro, Emilian Kavalski, Eun Mee Kim, Chung‐in Moon, Uk Heo, Paul Midford, John Samuel Fitch, Heejin Han, Laura Neack and Shintaro Hamanaka.

In The Last Decade

Pacific Focus

284 papers receiving 886 citations

Fields of papers published in Pacific Focus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Focus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Focus.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Focus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Focus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Focus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Focus more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026