˜The œJournal of private enterprise

255 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise usually cover Economics and Econometrics (81 papers), Sociology and Political Science (42 papers) and Education (36 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Educational Methods (27 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (26 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise are Joshua C. Hall, Edward Peter Stringham, Richard J. Cebula, John R. Boatright, Russell S. Sobel, Tomi Ovaska, J. R. Clark, Robert A. Lawson, Benjamin Powell and Michael J. Hicks.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œJournal of private enterprise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œJournal of private enterprise more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025