Eye and Vision

400 papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 400 papers published in Eye and Vision in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Eye and Vision usually cover Ophthalmology (316 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (296 papers) and Epidemiology (133 papers) specifically the topics of Corneal surgery and disorders (221 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (193 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eye and Vision are Ryan Lee, Tien Yin Wong, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Jorge L. Alió, Katie L. Pennington, Margaret M. DeAngelis, Colm McAlinden, Jorge L. Alió del Barrio, Leonardo Mastropasqua and Alfredo Vega-Estrada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Eye and Vision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Eye and Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eye and Vision.

Countries where authors publish in Eye and Vision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eye and Vision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eye and Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eye and Vision more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025