Eye and Vision

430 papers and 8.8k indexed citations

About

The 430 papers published in Eye and Vision in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Eye and Vision usually cover Ophthalmology (332 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (311 papers) and Epidemiology (141 papers) specifically the topics of Corneal surgery and disorders (231 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (202 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eye and Vision are Tien Yin Wong, Ryan Lee, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Jorge L. Alió, Margaret M. DeAngelis, Katie L. Pennington, Colm McAlinden, Jorge L. Alió del Barrio, Leonardo Mastropasqua and Alfredo Vega-Estrada.

In The Last Decade

Eye and Vision

390 papers receiving 8.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Eye and Vision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eye and Vision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eye and Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eye and Vision more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Eye and Vision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Eye and Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eye and Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026