Open Archaeology

343 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 343 papers published in Open Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Open Archaeology usually cover Paleontology (166 papers), Archeology (165 papers) and Anthropology (96 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (166 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (71 papers) and Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Archaeology are Jeremy Huggett, Robert H. Tykot, Stuart Jeffrey, Michael O’Rourke, Heide Wrobel Nørgaard, Christopher H. Roosevelt, Costis Dallas, Michael Lewis, Suzie Thomas and Sara Perry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Open Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Open Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025