Open Access Emergency Medicine

410 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 410 papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine usually cover Emergency Medicine (204 papers), Surgery (116 papers) and Epidemiology (73 papers) specifically the topics of Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (82 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (82 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Access Emergency Medicine are Jyotsna Joshi, David M. Wood, Bruno Mégarbane, Simon Cooper, Seán Kennelly, John McCabe, Laura Hunter, Brian Maguire, Kyle A. Weant and Stephanie Baker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Open Access Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Access Emergency Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Access Emergency Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Access Emergency Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025