Countries where authors publish in OncoTargets and Therapy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in OncoTargets and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OncoTargets and Therapy more than expected).
Fields of papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy
This network shows the impact of papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy.
About OncoTargets and Therapy
The 5.9k papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 115.6k indexed citations . Papers published in OncoTargets and Therapy usually cover Cancer Research (1.2k papers), Oncology (1.3k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (866 papers), Molecular Biology (1.5k papers) and Genetics (198 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (571 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (371 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (308 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (291 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (226 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (181 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (162 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in OncoTargets and Therapy are Tomas Koltai, Li Kong, Victoria Bolós, Feifei Teng, Jinming Yu, Haijun Zhang, Xin Wang, Lars M. Wagner, Marie P. Khoury and Jean‐Christophe Bourdon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.