Obesity Science & Practice

635 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 635 papers published in Obesity Science & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Obesity Science & Practice usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (282 papers), Clinical Psychology (196 papers) and Physiology (177 papers) specifically the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (250 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (183 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Obesity Science & Practice are Ghose Bishwajit, Lenny R. Vartanian, Eric Robinson, Anurag Mehta, Steven P. Marso, Ian J. Neeland, Andrew Jones, Rena R. Wing, Steven M. Gillespie and Kathryn M. Ross.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Obesity Science & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Obesity Science & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Obesity Science & Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Obesity Science & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Obesity Science & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Obesity Science & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Obesity Science & Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025