Nursing History Review

447 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 447 papers published in Nursing History Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing History Review usually cover History (134 papers), Sociology and Political Science (98 papers) and Clinical Psychology (71 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (69 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (64 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing History Review are Joanna Bourke, Tom Olson, Germán E. Berríos, Barbra Mann Wall, DIANE HAMILTON, Brigid Lusk, Patricia D’Antonio, Sander L. Gilman, Cynthia Connolly and Victoria T. Grando.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nursing History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025