National Science Review

2.2k papers and 67.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in National Science Review in the last decades have received a total of 67.9k indexed citations. Papers published in National Science Review usually cover Materials Chemistry (472 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (365 papers) and Molecular Biology (284 papers) specifically the topics of Advancements in Battery Materials (89 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (85 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in National Science Review are Zhi‐Hua Zhou, Yue-Liang Wu, Wenrui Hu, Qiang Yang, Yu Zhang, Jianqing Fan, Fang Han, Han Liu, Rajib Paul and Xuli Chen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in National Science Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in National Science Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in National Science Review.

Countries where authors publish in National Science Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in National Science Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in National Science Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Science Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025