Nanoscale Research Letters
About
In The Last Decade
Nanoscale Research Letters
6.2k papers receiving 201.3k citations
Fields of papers published in Nanoscale Research Letters
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanoscale Research Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanoscale Research Letters.
Countries where authors publish in Nanoscale Research Letters
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanoscale Research Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanoscale Research Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanoscale Research Letters more than expected).
- Liposome: classification, preparation, and applications (2013)
- Effects of crystallization and dopant concentration on the emission behavior of TiO2:Eu nanophosphors (2012)
- Monodisperse α-Fe2O3 Mesoporous Microspheres: One-Step NaCl-Assisted Microwave-Solvothermal Preparation, Size Control and Photocatalytic Property (2010)
- Prepare dispersed CIS nano-scale particles and spray coating CIS absorber layers using nano-scale precursors (2014)
- Transport properties of two finite armchair graphene nanoribbons (2013)
- Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Surface Functionalization Strategies (2008)
- Improved Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Properties of MWCNT–PMMA Composites Using Layered Structures (2009)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.