NeuroMolecular Medicine

1.0k papers and 33.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.0k papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 33.0k indexed citations. Papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (465 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (285 papers) and Physiology (226 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (130 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (127 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NeuroMolecular Medicine are Mark P. Mattson, Henriette van Praag, Ronald S. Duman, P. Hemachandra Reddy, Marc Gleichmann, D. Neil Granger, Monika Fleshner, Norman J. Haughey, Anna Ratka and Dong Liu.

In The Last Decade

NeuroMolecular Medicine

967 papers receiving 31.8k citations

Fields of papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in NeuroMolecular Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NeuroMolecular Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NeuroMolecular Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NeuroMolecular Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026