Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi

879 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 879 papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi usually cover Molecular Biology (212 papers), Infectious Diseases (170 papers) and Epidemiology (135 papers) specifically the topics of Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (87 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (68 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi are Masako Toda, Sachie Okubo, Takahiro Shimamura, Hisahiro Yoshida, Shōgo Kuwahara, Riichi Sakazaki, Toshikazu Kobayashi, Tadakatsu Shimamura, Akira Tamura and Yasuyoshi Ike.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi.

Countries where authors publish in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025