Neurotoxicity Research

2.1k papers and 54.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Neurotoxicity Research in the last decades have received a total of 54.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurotoxicity Research usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (784 papers), Molecular Biology (685 papers) and Physiology (374 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (453 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (270 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (235 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurotoxicity Research are Richard M. Kostrzewa, Roy A. Wise, Trevor Archer, Yousef Tizabi, Gilles J. Guillemin, Mark A. Geyer, Juan Segura‐Aguilar, Richard J Beninger, Moussa B. H. Youdim and Micaela Morelli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurotoxicity Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurotoxicity Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurotoxicity Research.

Countries where authors publish in Neurotoxicity Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurotoxicity Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurotoxicity Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurotoxicity Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025