Neuropsychopharmacology Reports

468 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 468 papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (173 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (88 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (84 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (72 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (54 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports are Tsuyoshi Miyakawa, Hirotaka Shoji, Tahir Hakami, Winston W. Shen, Hiroshi Kunugi, Keizo Takao, Mitsuyuki Matsumoto, Soichiro Nakahara, Satoko Hattori and Theo G.M. van Erp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychopharmacology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025