Neurophysiologie Clinique

1.4k papers and 26.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (510 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (311 papers) and Neurology (288 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (206 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (177 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurophysiologie Clinique are Luis García‐Larrea, Roland Peyron, B. Laurent, J.-P. Lefaucheur, Jean‐Pascal Lefaucheur, Jörg Krieger, Rodney J. Croft, Robert J. Barry, Jürgen Lorenz and Ángel Esteban.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique.

Countries where authors publish in Neurophysiologie Clinique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurophysiologie Clinique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurophysiologie Clinique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurophysiologie Clinique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025