Neurology Clinical Practice

1.3k papers and 9.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice usually cover Neurology (465 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (286 papers) and Epidemiology (183 papers) specifically the topics of Epilepsy research and treatment (117 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (92 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurology Clinical Practice are Jan Dirk Blom, Jerome H. Chin, Norman Relkin, Michael A. Williams, Melissa J. Armstrong, Robert D. Brown, Lindsy N. Williams, Mitchell S.V. Elkind, Shadi Yaghi and Álvaro Pascual‐Leone.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Neurology Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurology Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurology Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurology Clinical Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025