Nature Reviews Methods Primers

231 papers and 18.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 231 papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers in the last decades have received a total of 18.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers usually cover Molecular Biology (56 papers), Biomedical Engineering (53 papers) and Materials Chemistry (31 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (16 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (12 papers) and Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Methods Primers are P. R. Bunker, Mark E. Orazem, Oumaïma Gharbi, Vincent Vivier, Ming Gao, Jianbo Zhang, Shangshang Wang, Bing Zhao, Christy L. Haynes and Rebeca S. Rodriguez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Methods Primers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Methods Primers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025