Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters
20092.1k citationsBryan Hirschorn, Mark E. Orazem et al.Electrochimica Actaprofile →
CPE analysis by local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
20051.4k citationsMark E. Orazem, Nadine Pébère et al.Electrochimica Actaprofile →
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
20081.3k citationsMark E. Orazem, Bernard Tribolletprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Orazem
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Orazem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Orazem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Orazem more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Orazem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Orazem. The network helps show where Mark E. Orazem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Orazem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Orazem.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Orazem based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Orazem. Mark E. Orazem is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Orazem, Mark E., Isabelle Frateur, Bernard Tribollet, et al.. (2013). Dielectric Properties of Materials Showing Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Impedance Response. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 160(6). C215–C225.468 indexed citations breakdown →
Hirschorn, Bryan, Mark E. Orazem, Bernard Tribollet, et al.. (2010). Constant-Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Resistivity Distributions in Films. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 157(12). C452–C452.454 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Hirschorn, Bryan, Mark E. Orazem, Bernard Tribollet, et al.. (2009). Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochimica Acta. 55(21). 6218–6227.2071 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Orazem, Mark E., et al.. (1997). Mathematical Models for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline with Coating Holidays: Part 2 Case Studies of Parallel Anode Cathodic Protection Systems underground pipelines by parallel-ribbon anodes.. CORROSION. 53(6).2 indexed citations
18.
Orazem, Mark E., et al.. (1996). Computer modeling aids traditional cathodic protection design methods for coated pipelines. Materials performance. 35(6). 16–20.5 indexed citations
19.
Orazem, Mark E.. (1990). The Impedance Response of Semiconductors: An Electrochemical Engineering Perspective.. Chemical Engineering Education. 24(1). 48–55.1 indexed citations
20.
Orazem, Mark E. & Dinesh O. Shah. (1990). A One-Hour Professional Development Course for Chemical Engineers.. Chemical Engineering Education. 24(3).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.