Journal of Gambling Issues

499 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 499 papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues usually cover Clinical Psychology (444 papers), Sociology and Political Science (95 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (66 papers) specifically the topics of Gambling Behavior and Treatments (439 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (131 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Gambling Issues are Garry J. Smith, Mark D. Griffiths, Keis Ohtsuka, Jeffrey L. Derevensky, David Korn, Per Binde, Rachel A. Volberg, Nigel E. Turner, Peter Collins and Rina Gupta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Gambling Issues

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Gambling Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Gambling Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Gambling Issues more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025