NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

578 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 578 papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics usually cover Molecular Biology (526 papers), Cancer Research (99 papers) and Genetics (96 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (168 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (139 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics are Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky, Tomáš Brůna, W. Evan Johnson, Giovanni Parmigiani, Katharina J. Hoff, Mario Stanke, Anton Nekrutenko, Nicholas Stoler and Nicolas Maillet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.

Countries where authors publish in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025