Nanotoxicology

1.2k papers and 55.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Nanotoxicology in the last decades have received a total of 55.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Nanotoxicology usually cover Materials Chemistry (883 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (421 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (276 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (822 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (209 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nanotoxicology are Vicki Stone, Ken Donaldson, Günter Oberdörster, Richard D. Handy, Agnes G. Oomen, Alexandros Besinis, Roel P. F. Schins, Megan J. Osmond-McLeod, Maxine J. McCall and Nancy A. Monteiro‐Riviere.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nanotoxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanotoxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanotoxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Nanotoxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanotoxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanotoxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanotoxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025