Countries where authors publish in Mucosal Immunology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mucosal Immunology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mucosal Immunology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mucosal Immunology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mucosal Immunology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mucosal Immunology.
About Mucosal Immunology
The 1.7k papers published in Mucosal Immunology in the last decades have received a total of 96.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Mucosal Immunology usually cover Immunology (1.2k papers), Virology (90 papers), Microbiology (97 papers), Immunology and Allergy (77 papers) and Infectious Diseases (231 papers) specifically the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (520 papers), IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways (345 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (272 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (266 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (184 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (172 papers), Gut microbiota and health (163 papers) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mucosal Immunology are Allan McI. Mowat, Oliver Pabst, Gérard Eberl, Benjamin J. Marsland, Thomas A. Wynn, Mark S. Wilson, Charles A. Parkos, Markus F. Neurath, Anh Thu Dang and Blaise Corthésy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.