Countries where authors publish in Cellular Microbiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular Microbiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular Microbiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular Microbiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cellular Microbiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular Microbiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular Microbiology.
About Cellular Microbiology
The 3.0k papers published in Cellular Microbiology in the last decades have received a total of 170.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Cellular Microbiology usually cover Endocrinology (557 papers), Parasitology (383 papers), Microbiology (294 papers), Immunology (836 papers) and Infectious Diseases (710 papers) specifically the topics of Escherichia coli research studies (284 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (274 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (273 papers), Malaria Research and Control (194 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (179 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (165 papers), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (150 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (138 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular Microbiology are Robert A. Heinzen, Daniel E. Voth, Susan L. Fink, Brad T. Cookson, B. Brett Finlay, Patricia G. Spear, Gad Frankel, Arturo Casadevall, Luanne Hall‐Stoodley and Paul Stoodley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.