Natural Resources Forum

1.4k papers and 19.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Natural Resources Forum in the last decades have received a total of 19.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Resources Forum usually cover Economics and Econometrics (336 papers), Sociology and Political Science (241 papers) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (205 papers) specifically the topics of Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (206 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (149 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Resources Forum are Christopher McCrudden, Gavin Hilson, Malin Falkenmark, Frederico Neto, Jules Pretty, Jan Lundqvist, Karsten Becker, Aaron T. Wolf, Sandra Postel and Carl Gösta Widstrand.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Resources Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Resources Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Resources Forum.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Resources Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Resources Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Resources Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Resources Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025