Management International Review

937 papers and 32.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 937 papers published in Management International Review in the last decades have received a total of 32.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Management International Review usually cover Strategy and Management (666 papers), Accounting (254 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (165 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (532 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (253 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (230 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Management International Review are Andrew McAuley, Lilac Nachum, Yadong Luo, Peter J. Buckley, Gabler Verlag, Jean‐François Hennart, Rudolf R. Sinkovics, Winfried Ruigrok, Alain Verbeke and Farok J. Contractor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Management International Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Management International Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Management International Review.

Countries where authors publish in Management International Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Management International Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Management International Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Management International Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025