Countries where authors publish in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metallography Microstructure and Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis.
About Metallography Microstructure and Analysis
The 788 papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis usually cover Metals and Alloys (97 papers), Archeology (29 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (661 papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (202 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (169 papers) and Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Metallography Microstructure and Analysis are L.E. Murr, M. Pohl, John G. Speer, Marina Knyazeva, A. Stern, Li Wang, H. M. Tawancy, I. Rosenthal, N. Frage and Eli Vandersluis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.