Marketing Theory

About

The 707 papers published in Marketing Theory in the last decades have received a total of 30.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Marketing Theory usually cover Marketing (456 papers), Sociology and Political Science (251 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (211 papers) specifically the topics of Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (330 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (129 papers) and Service and Product Innovation (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marketing Theory are Christian Grönroos, Stephen L. Vargo, Robert F. Lusch, Bernard Covà, Mark Tadajewski, Jennifer D. Chandler, Per Skålén, Raquel Sánchez‐Fernández, María Ángeles Iniesta Bonillo and Per Echeverri.

In The Last Decade

Marketing Theory

669 papers receiving 28.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Marketing Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marketing Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marketing Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marketing Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Marketing Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marketing Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marketing Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026