Medicine Science and the Law

2.5k papers and 21.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Medicine Science and the Law in the last decades have received a total of 21.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Medicine Science and the Law usually cover Clinical Psychology (636 papers), Emergency Medicine (397 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (322 papers) specifically the topics of Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (285 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (244 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (224 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medicine Science and the Law are C. J. Hackett, Gisli H. Gudjónsson, Peter Scott, Robert P. Brittain, Alan Wayne Jones, Ajit Shah, B Meel, Christopher M. Milroy, Herschel Prins and Roger W. Byard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medicine Science and the Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medicine Science and the Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medicine Science and the Law.

Countries where authors publish in Medicine Science and the Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medicine Science and the Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medicine Science and the Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medicine Science and the Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025