Leonardo Music Journal

460 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 460 papers published in Leonardo Music Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Leonardo Music Journal usually cover Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (248 papers), Music (141 papers) and Signal Processing (74 papers) specifically the topics of Music Technology and Sound Studies (247 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (78 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Leonardo Music Journal are Gregory Kramer, Albert S. Bregman, George Lewis, Judy Malloy, Axel Mulder, Frank R. Moore, Robert Rowe, Marc Battier, Damián Keller and Douglas A. Kahn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Leonardo Music Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Leonardo Music Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Leonardo Music Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Leonardo Music Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Leonardo Music Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Leonardo Music Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonardo Music Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025