Linguistic Typology

417 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 417 papers published in Linguistic Typology in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Linguistic Typology usually cover Language and Linguistics (294 papers), Linguistics and Language (191 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (209 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (180 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Linguistic Typology are Maria Koptjevskaja‐Tamm, Henrik Liljegren, Scott DeLancey, Martín Haspelmath, Johan van der Auwera, Vladimir Plungian, John H. McWhorter, Balthasar Bickel, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Frans Plank.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Linguistic Typology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Linguistic Typology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Linguistic Typology.

Countries where authors publish in Linguistic Typology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Linguistic Typology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Linguistic Typology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistic Typology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025