Countries where authors publish in Liebigs Annalen
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Liebigs Annalen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Liebigs Annalen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liebigs Annalen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Liebigs Annalen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Liebigs Annalen.
About Liebigs Annalen
The 930 papers published in Liebigs Annalen in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Liebigs Annalen usually cover Organic Chemistry (744 papers), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (112 papers) and Spectroscopy (109 papers) specifically the topics of Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (134 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (129 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (99 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (84 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (75 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (62 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (61 papers) and Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Liebigs Annalen are Javier Catalán, Dieter Enders, Richard R. Schmidt, Dieter Seebàch, Piet Herdewijn, Cristina Dı́az, Frieder W. Lichtenthaler, Stefan Immel, Kenji Mori and Pilar Pérez.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.