Literature film quarterly

226 papers and 245 indexed citations i.

About

The 226 papers published in Literature film quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 245 indexed citations. Papers published in Literature film quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (162 papers), Economics and Econometrics (72 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (34 papers) specifically the topics of Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (107 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (71 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Literature film quarterly are Krin Gabbard, Kamilla Elliott, Wheeler Winston Dixon, Wendy Everett, Anne Hickling‐Hudson, Sarah Cardwell, Vivian Sobchack, Ramona Wray, John C. Gerlach and Simone Murray.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Literature film quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Literature film quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Literature film quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Literature film quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Literature film quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Literature film quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Literature film quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025