Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics

948 papers and 31.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 948 papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics in the last decades have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics usually cover Molecular Biology (754 papers), Cancer Research (143 papers) and Genetics (132 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (162 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (113 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics are Jun Yu, Kin Fai Au, Anthony Rhoads, Zhang Zhang, Melissa J. Fullwood, Yiwen Fang, Iain M. Dykes, Costanza Emanueli, Zhiwu Zhang and Songnian Hu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics.

Countries where authors publish in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025