Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

818 papers and 14.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 818 papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation usually cover Clinical Psychology (622 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (393 papers) and Philosophy (123 papers) specifically the topics of Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (383 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (241 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation are Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis, Jennifer J. Freyd, Paul F. Dell, Colin A. Ross, Anne P. DePrince, Onno van der Hart, Adriano Schimmenti, Vedat Şar, Richard J. Brown and Lewis R. Goldberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Trauma & Dissociation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025