Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

1.8k papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps usually cover Emergency Medicine (366 papers), Surgery (340 papers) and Emergency Medical Services (236 papers) specifically the topics of Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (245 papers), Disaster Response and Management (217 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps are Martin Bricknell, J Clasper, TJ Hodgetts, Jon Clasper, Ian Cullis, Jason Smith, Mark J. Midwinter, PF Mahoney, John Breeze and Mark S Bailey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025