Journal of Planning History

299 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 299 papers published in Journal of Planning History in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Planning History usually cover Urban Studies (94 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (53 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (52 papers) specifically the topics of Urbanization and City Planning (72 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (39 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Planning History are Michael E. Smith, Emily Talen, Theodore S. Eisenman, Amy Hillier, Sonia Hirt, Domenic Vitiello, Catherine Brinkley, Jeffrey Brown, Faranak Miraftab and June Manning Thomas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Planning History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Planning History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Planning History.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Planning History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Planning History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Planning History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Planning History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025