Polymer Reviews

403 papers and 31.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 403 papers published in Polymer Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 31.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Polymer Reviews usually cover Polymers and Plastics (163 papers), Biomaterials (137 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (108 papers) specifically the topics of Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (59 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (59 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polymer Reviews are Zoran S. Petrovìć, Charlotte K. Williams, Marc A. Hillmyer, Robert B. Grubbs, Gerrit A. Luinstra, Caroline L. Schauer, Jessica D. Schiffman, Nor Aziah Buang, Jong‐Young Lee and Alfred J. Crosby.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Polymer Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Polymer Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polymer Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Polymer Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polymer Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polymer Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polymer Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025