Journal für Entwicklungspolitik

265 papers and 706 indexed citations i.

About

The 265 papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik in the last decades have received a total of 706 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik usually cover Sociology and Political Science (71 papers), Political Science and International Relations (53 papers) and Development (23 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (23 papers), Economic and Social Issues (20 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik are Maristella Svampa, Joachim Becker, Ulrich Brand, Martin Heß, Jeremy Seekings, Klaus Dörre, E Swyngedouw, Cristóbal Kay, Peter Drahos and Simone Claar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik.

Countries where authors publish in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal für Entwicklungspolitik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal für Entwicklungspolitik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025