Countries where authors publish in The Application of Clinical Genetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Application of Clinical Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Application of Clinical Genetics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics.
About The Application of Clinical Genetics
The 305 papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics usually cover Genetics (94 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (17 papers) and Genetics (20 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (27 papers), Congenital heart defects research (20 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Application of Clinical Genetics are Lynne M. Bird, Thomas Gasser, Anthony O. Fedele, Berit Kerner, Anwar Ullah, Sulman Basit, Muhammad Jaseem Khan, Sabina Gallati, Elena Pischik and Raili Kauppinen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.