The Journal for Nurse Practitioners

2.3k papers and 10.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners usually cover General Health Professions (692 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (503 papers) and Epidemiology (277 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Roles and Practices (291 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (141 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners are Jan DiSantostefano, Demetrius J. Porche, Jessica N. Pelkowski, Shilpa N. Gajarawala, Mary Koithan, Hilary Barnes, Ann Marie Hart, Laurie Anne Ferguson, Judith A. Berry and Donald Gardenier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal for Nurse Practitioners with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal for Nurse Practitioners more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025