JMIR Research Protocols

3.8k papers and 25.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in JMIR Research Protocols in the last decades have received a total of 25.9k indexed citations. Papers published in JMIR Research Protocols usually cover General Health Professions (1.3k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (674 papers) and Clinical Psychology (569 papers) specifically the topics of Mobile Health Interventions and Applications (563 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (384 papers) and Prevention and Treatment of HIV/AIDS Infection (234 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JMIR Research Protocols are Patrick S. Sullivan, Kurt J. G. Schmailzl, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Rob Stephenson, Jobke Wentzel, Myoungock Jang, Allison Vorderstrasse, Lex van Velsen, Margaret Allman‐Farinelli and Calvin Kalun Or.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JMIR Research Protocols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JMIR Research Protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JMIR Research Protocols.

Countries where authors publish in JMIR Research Protocols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JMIR Research Protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JMIR Research Protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JMIR Research Protocols more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025