JMIR Mental Health

1.1k papers and 22.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in JMIR Mental Health in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations. Papers published in JMIR Mental Health usually cover Applied Psychology (666 papers), Clinical Psychology (426 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (316 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Mental Health Interventions (658 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (254 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (228 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JMIR Mental Health are Alison Darcy, Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Nikki S. Rickard, John Torous, Elizabeth Seabrook, David Bakker, Debra Rickwood, Margaret L. Kern, Nikolaos Kazantzis and Vincent I. O. Agyapong.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JMIR Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JMIR Mental Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JMIR Mental Health.

Countries where authors publish in JMIR Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JMIR Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JMIR Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JMIR Mental Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025