New Astronomy Reviews

1.3k papers and 20.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in New Astronomy Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations. Papers published in New Astronomy Reviews usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (496 papers) and Instrumentation (241 papers) specifically the topics of Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (446 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (358 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (336 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Astronomy Reviews are J. P. Lasota, K. A. van der Hucht, Richard G. Edgar, Leandros Perivolaropoulos, Foteini Skara, J. P. Vallée, D. M. Alexander, Ryan C. Hickox, Arthur Kosowsky and Jay Farihi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Astronomy Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Astronomy Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Astronomy Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in New Astronomy Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Astronomy Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Astronomy Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Astronomy Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025