Journal of Aging and Health

1.9k papers and 55.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Journal of Aging and Health in the last decades have received a total of 55.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Aging and Health usually cover Health (906 papers), General Health Professions (840 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (351 papers) specifically the topics of Health disparities and outcomes (867 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (305 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (237 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Aging and Health are Lisa Berkman, Denis A. Evans, Joan Cornoni‐Huntley, Neal Krause, Frank J. Kohout, Elizabeth Dugan, Caitlin Coyle, Judith G. Chipperfield, Carol D. Ryff and Richard Schulz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Aging and Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Aging and Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Aging and Health.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Aging and Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Aging and Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Aging and Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Aging and Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025