Countries where authors publish in Frontline Gastroenterology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontline Gastroenterology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontline Gastroenterology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology.
About Frontline Gastroenterology
The 924 papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Frontline Gastroenterology usually cover Gastroenterology (179 papers), Hepatology (130 papers) and Surgery (439 papers) specifically the topics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (155 papers), Microscopic Colitis (131 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (121 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (108 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (106 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (82 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (78 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontline Gastroenterology are Quentin M. Anstee, Stuart McPherson, Jessica Dyson, Alexander C. Ford, Siwan Thomas‐Gibson, Jeremy M. D. Nightingale, Niels Vande Casteele, Iain Ewing, Kieran Moriarty and Adam S. Cheifetz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.